Clalit Health Fund: "We supplied incorrect data, please ignore"
Translation: Oops, the data clearly reveals the jabs cause cardiac arrests and strokes to skyrocket. Give us time to massage the data and we'll get back to you with something that proves the jabs are totally safe.
Posted December 07, 2022 - preprint ( ... currently v2 )
—-
... and Peter C Gøtzsche in regards to it:
Denied publication of study on the COVID-19 vaccines
"Peter Gøtzsche cannot get his systematic review of "serious damage from the Covid-19 vaccine" published. "It is very difficult to publish anything about the COVID-19 vaccines that goes against the official narrative", says Peter Gøtzsche"
Even if it's under-reported, there can never be more accurate than those that actually record the numbers. It's much less accurate to just pick a number from the imagination like many do.
"ALL data given to you on July 6, 2023 is incorrect"??
That unqualified, unlimited, undefined statement means that this is NOT a case of "partial or inordinate data".
But... Seriously?
You don't respond to a legal formalized information request by releasing an ENTIRELY and COMPLETELY wrong dataset.
And then only announce the huge mistake a month later, after the Kakka has hit the fan.
And then insinuate that those who used the data in good faith are now to blame if the data has gone viral.
Someone at Clalit, someone Very High Up, should be fired immediately for compound incompetence.
If that doesn't happen, then this will go down as one of Israel's clumsiest-ever cover-up attempts in the history of health abuse.
Either way, if anyone was guilty of "publishing preliminary, unverified information," it was NOT Israelab. Don't let them make you guys the scapegoat!!
Clalit Health Fund: "We supplied incorrect data, please ignore"
Translation: Oops, the data clearly reveals the jabs cause cardiac arrests and strokes to skyrocket. Give us time to massage the data and we'll get back to you with something that proves the jabs are totally safe.
In regards to "data":
2% of vaccine reactions reported
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGmOLkmfWIU
Dr. John Campbell - 12.08.2023
"Therefore up to 98% not reported. A system beset by conflicts of interest"
---
... and some history to it:
Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions : a systematic review
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16689555/
https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200629050-00003
20 November 2012 ( Issue Date May 2006 ! ) with Springer`s Paywall
Keyword: adverse drug reactions (ADRs)
—-
... and the "famose" Lazarus Report - a study done between 2006 and 2009 - only 1% of adverse events reported on vaccines:
Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse - Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS)
https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system
https://openvaers.com/images/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-20116.pdf
Inclusive dates: 12/01/07 - 09/30/10
—-
And then:
Serious harms of the COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.06.22283145v1
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.06.22283145
Peter C Gøtzsche, Maryanne Demasi
Posted December 07, 2022 - preprint ( ... currently v2 )
—-
... and Peter C Gøtzsche in regards to it:
Denied publication of study on the COVID-19 vaccines
"Peter Gøtzsche cannot get his systematic review of "serious damage from the Covid-19 vaccine" published. "It is very difficult to publish anything about the COVID-19 vaccines that goes against the official narrative", says Peter Gøtzsche"
https://fbf.one/naegtes-publicering-af-studie-om-covid-19-vaccinerne/#
Published on 13 May 2023
—-
Mistakes were NOT made.
You should call him teacher Campbell. He has a phd in teaching. Not medicine or science.
Do you have a more accurate figure of the % of adverse events reported?
You can look at the actual data from vaers and vsafe and ignore the spin Campbell tries to put on it hoping people won’t look at the data themselves.
These systems are known to suffer from under-reporting. Do you have a reliable, more accurate figure?
Even if it's under-reported, there can never be more accurate than those that actually record the numbers. It's much less accurate to just pick a number from the imagination like many do.
NO, ISRAELAB -- DON'T FALL FOR THIS.
"ALL data given to you on July 6, 2023 is incorrect"??
That unqualified, unlimited, undefined statement means that this is NOT a case of "partial or inordinate data".
But... Seriously?
You don't respond to a legal formalized information request by releasing an ENTIRELY and COMPLETELY wrong dataset.
And then only announce the huge mistake a month later, after the Kakka has hit the fan.
And then insinuate that those who used the data in good faith are now to blame if the data has gone viral.
Someone at Clalit, someone Very High Up, should be fired immediately for compound incompetence.
If that doesn't happen, then this will go down as one of Israel's clumsiest-ever cover-up attempts in the history of health abuse.
Either way, if anyone was guilty of "publishing preliminary, unverified information," it was NOT Israelab. Don't let them make you guys the scapegoat!!