“Turbo cancer is something that wasn’t there, and all of a sudden, it’s everywhere. So it goes from being in one spot to [being] everywhere all at once.”
---
Famous Pro-Vaccine Doctor Suspects Pfizer Booster Shot Sent His Cancer Into Overdrive
Well, I suspect that the "unknown category" always looks like this.
Say it was 2015 now and you would display 2012-2015, you'd still see "unknown" increase the same way it does now from 2019 through 2022.
There is a similar phenomenom in mortality data with R99 codes. In recent data, you'll always see an excess of R99 and a deficit of all other diagnoses, because R99 is preliminary. Data will eventually get updated which is when R99 is replaced by other codes.
I suspect cancers get registered, but the details get added later. There is a lot of lag in cancer registries (e.g. data is finalized after 5 years or so in the German registry).
This would fit the data you presented, because most cancers decrease, while "unknown" increases.
Thank you, you brought up an interesting point. As far as we understood the data (and unfortunately we don't have open communication with those who supplied it, only via FOIA) this is not 'unknown cancer' but rather a specific diagnosis - Cancer of Unknown Primary cause. It's a type of cancer, as explained in the post.
In addition, the way the data was extracted is by examining ICD codes from the database. Cases are not resolved along time (unlike traditional cancer registration), instead the diagnosis code remains, and therefore is not expected to change along time.
We do not have the full data required to conduct proper research, we are merely testing for safety signals and recommending further investigation.
"A group of STEM-policy professionals that included 14 members of Biosafety Now's leadership team submitted a letter to the Editor of Nature Medicine asking them to publish an expression of editorial concern for the paper “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2,” and to begin a process of withdrawal or retraction of the paper."
"We are seeking to expose a clear case of scientific fraud and misconduct that has had a major impact on public opinion and policy. The removal of 'The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2' from the scientific literature is the first step in a long process to repair the damage this paper has caused to public trust in science."
Let me introduce findings from around the world in this regard:
Cancer Taking Off ‘Like Wildfire’: Unsettling Insights from Pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole
https://www.globalresearch.ca/cancer-taking-off-like-wildfire-unsettling-insights-from-pathologist-dr-ryan-cole/5823420
June 21, 2023
“Turbo cancer is something that wasn’t there, and all of a sudden, it’s everywhere. So it goes from being in one spot to [being] everywhere all at once.”
---
Famous Pro-Vaccine Doctor Suspects Pfizer Booster Shot Sent His Cancer Into Overdrive
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/doctor-michael-goldman-pfizer-covid-booster-shot-cancer/
Sept. 27, 2022
—-
Turbo-Cancer
We have a problem.
https://etana.substack.com/p/turbo-cancer
Dr. Ute Kruger is a researcher and senior physician at Lunds University in Sweden - Aug. 4, 2022
... and
Senior Physician Warns: Aggressive and Unusual Cancers following Covid 'Vaccination' are on the Rise in Sweden (Video)
https://rairfoundation.com/senior-physician-warns-aggressive-and-unusual-cancers-following-covid-vaccination-are-on-the-rise-in-sweden-video/
July 27, 2022
---
The phenomena behind as per my perception:
More now known about vaccine-acquired immune deficiency syndrome (VAIDS)
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/more-now-known-about-vaccine-acquired-immune-deficiency-syndrome-vaids
Saturday, 22nd July 2023
---
And there was/is a warning - fully ignored:
The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.03.21256520v1
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.03.21256520
May 6, 2021 - a preprint - still !
Aren't these just reporting delays?
Please explain?
Well, I suspect that the "unknown category" always looks like this.
Say it was 2015 now and you would display 2012-2015, you'd still see "unknown" increase the same way it does now from 2019 through 2022.
There is a similar phenomenom in mortality data with R99 codes. In recent data, you'll always see an excess of R99 and a deficit of all other diagnoses, because R99 is preliminary. Data will eventually get updated which is when R99 is replaced by other codes.
I suspect cancers get registered, but the details get added later. There is a lot of lag in cancer registries (e.g. data is finalized after 5 years or so in the German registry).
This would fit the data you presented, because most cancers decrease, while "unknown" increases.
I don't think it's a signal.
Thank you, you brought up an interesting point. As far as we understood the data (and unfortunately we don't have open communication with those who supplied it, only via FOIA) this is not 'unknown cancer' but rather a specific diagnosis - Cancer of Unknown Primary cause. It's a type of cancer, as explained in the post.
In addition, the way the data was extracted is by examining ICD codes from the database. Cases are not resolved along time (unlike traditional cancer registration), instead the diagnosis code remains, and therefore is not expected to change along time.
We do not have the full data required to conduct proper research, we are merely testing for safety signals and recommending further investigation.
So do cases go into multiple categories or just one?
The lower cervical cancer rates look like they're gonna serve as advertisement for HPV vaccines in the future. :D
We can only guess. Probably one case can receive multiple diagnoses but it doesn't explain the rise in CUP cases.
Re cervical cancer - the data doesn't look very convincing but you're probably right re HPV vaccine advertisement...
And in regards to the "origin" of the "2019 novel coronavirus (SARS‐CoV‐2)":
Open Letter To Nature Medicine
https://biosafetynow.org/open-letter-to-nature-medicine/
introduced by the "Ethical Science Council":
"A group of STEM-policy professionals that included 14 members of Biosafety Now's leadership team submitted a letter to the Editor of Nature Medicine asking them to publish an expression of editorial concern for the paper “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2,” and to begin a process of withdrawal or retraction of the paper."
"We are seeking to expose a clear case of scientific fraud and misconduct that has had a major impact on public opinion and policy. The removal of 'The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2' from the scientific literature is the first step in a long process to repair the damage this paper has caused to public trust in science."
—-
The "toxic" paper - here:
The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9
Andersen, K.G., Rambaut, A., Lipkin, W.I. et al. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Med 26, 450–452 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9
Published 17 March 2020
---
The vaccines are a bio-weapons - funded and patented:
PATHOGEN VACCINES AND METHODS OF PRODUCING AND USING THE SAME
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/52/b1/13/3f86f0fa93a22c/WO2017143024A2.pdf
International Publication Number WO 2017/143024 A2
Applicant: PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE [US/US]; 17 Quincy Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 (US).
“GOVERNMENT SUPPORT The invention was made with government support under DARPA N66001- 11-1-4180.
The government has certain rights in the invention.”
24.08.2017
144 pages of diseases coming with the "vaccines" (!) including eradicted ones - the demons in the freezer.
And there is more:
mRNA, Nanolipid Particles and PEG: A Triad Never Used in Clinical Vaccines is Going to Be Tested on Hundreds of Millions of People
https://biomedres.us/fulltexts/BJSTR.MS.ID.005501.php
DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2021.34.005501
Feb. 22, 2021
—-
Worse Than the Disease?
Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19
https://www.ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i1.23
Published 2021-05-10 — Updated on 2021-06-16
Stephanie Seneff - Greg Nigh
---
Lab rats we became.